> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 06:56:20PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> > Everything seems to work just fine and as expected,
>
> your code, which is in whole cited below, doesn't actually know
> about the dependency
> foo.c foo.h: foo.list
>
> So i
Stepan Kasal wrote:
> About the side topic of suffixes:
> [...]
I finally decided that suffixes are good and ``are worth it'', mostly
because I use generated files in 4 different directories (with two
files in one of them), so rewriting the rule 5 times is kinda nasty.
Based on your suggestions, s
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:21:35PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> > > And I'd like to suggest that you use SUFFIXES to handle the .list
> > > source. Please look at the following example:
> >
> > Well, my generator is even more non-stan
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "Paul" == Paul Pogonyshev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Paul> Stepan Kasal wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> >> > beca
Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote:
> > because the generated sources are placed into the build directory,
> > while `make' looks for them in the source directory.
>
> generally, make should look for t
Hi.
I'm currently massaging my `Makefile.am's to allow building in a
separate directory. However, I have a problem which I cannot find
how to solve.
I have a few source (`.c' and `.h') files which are generated at
build time from another source using a custom utility. When the
build directory i
