Re: what caused the 'missing separator' message from the make?

2002-03-07 Thread Paul Lew
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> "Paul" == Paul Lew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Paul> 383 - @AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@$(DEPDIR)/SQLAllocHandle.Plo@am__quote@ Tom> This usually

Re: coexist multiple versions of automake

2002-03-07 Thread Paul Lew
> "Ben" == Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ben> You may want to have a look at my packaging of Autoconf 2.13 Ben> and Autoconf 2.52 for Debian, which includes an heuristic Ben> that automatically picks the right version of Autoconf to run Ben> in most cases. Thanks for

Re: coexist multiple versions of automake

2002-03-06 Thread Paul Lew
> "Allan" == Allan Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Allan> When you say "libraries", are you referring to Allan> libXXX.{a,so}, or "The ABC Corp Widget Library" (a Allan> collection of libraries and non-standard tools)? Sorry I did not state clearly. I meant libraries used by m

what caused the 'missing separator' message from the make?

2002-03-06 Thread Paul Lew
I am using automake-1.5 and one of the open source library I am trying to build use automake for its build. However, the configure seems to generate a malformed Makefile which failed to build with message: > configure > make -f Makefile ... Makefile:383: *** missing separato

coexist multiple versions of automake

2002-03-06 Thread Paul Lew
Sorry if this has been brought up before. I would like to propose we modify automake (and autoconf) to allow multiple versions of automake coexisting on a given system. In our work, we used various open source libraries and each one of them work with a particular version of automake. This makes