Re: [platform-testers] automake-1.16.92 released

2024-07-01 Thread Frederic Berat
On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 10:28 PM Karl Berry wrote: > Hi Frederic, > > Hello, > NetworkManager: > Use of uninitialized value $var in string eq at > /usr/share/automake-1.16/Automake/Variable.pm line 754, line > 1169. > > From the Makefile.am you sent me separately (attached here for

Re: [platform-testers] automake-1.16.92 released

2024-06-25 Thread Frederic Berat
Hello, I ran a mass rebuild on Fedora for packages that depend on automake with this version. Out of 1330 packages built, I found the following failures. NetworkManager: Use of uninitialized value $var in string eq at /usr/share/automake-1.16/Automake/Variable.pm line 754, line 1169. x2gokdrive

Re: [platform-testers] automake-1.16j pretest available: please test

2024-01-05 Thread Frederic Berat
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 6:14 PM Karl Berry wrote: > The GNU Automake 1.16j development snapshot is now available. Download > here: > > https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.16j.tar.xz > https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.16j.tar.gz > > Hello, No major issue found during my

Re: [platform-testers] automake-1.16i pretest available: please test

2023-12-19 Thread Frederic Berat
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:32 PM Karl Berry wrote: > We are pleased to announce the GNU Automake 1.16i development snapshot. > We intend for automake 1.17 to be released soon, essentially with only > bug fixes for whatever is found in this pretest. So please do test if at > all possible. > > It's

Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?

2023-03-06 Thread Frederic Berat
Hello, I spent some more time on testing, and I could reproduce the issue on Fedora rawhide, which gives more freedom for reproduction. Regarding what I said earlier, since that wasn't clear enough, I couldn't reproduce `make check` failures with the 1.16.5 official taball in a mock environment,

Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?

2023-03-06 Thread Frederic Berat
Oh, and I forgot, regarding autoconf: the RHEL 8 image I tested with had autoconf 2.69. Failures could be detected with automake trunk, not with official tarball (at least so far). On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 11:19 PM Frederic Berat wrote: > Hello, > > I spent some more time on testing, an

Re: rhel8 test failure confirmation?

2023-03-02 Thread Frederic Berat
Hello, For the record, I made a first run of testing on a rhel 8 system. While building the trunk directly led to check failures, rebuilding the RPM in a mock environment didn't. I'll likely spend more time next week to perform more testing. It may simply be an environment problem: I noticed the

Re: make check(s) pre-release problems

2022-10-11 Thread Frederic Berat
Hello, I don't know if that will help, or if that is completely unrelated, but I'm currently stumbling into a weird issue while working on a new package release for autoconf on Fedora: about 200 tests are now failing, all related to aclocal checks. My current investigation shows that it would be r