> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:04:28 +0800 (CST)
> From: haibin zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
>
> Hi all:
> automake-1.10 can't work with make-3.81 in Mingw in Windows XP, but
> automake-1.9.6 can work with make-3.81.
>
> I tested that automake-1.10 can work with make-3.79.1 in Mingw in Windows
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 09:46:33 -0500
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Berry)
>
> I don't know about doxygen, but javadoc has a well-developed mechanism
> for maintaining the documentation for functions/classes/etc. in the
> source file, and standard tools for extracting it.
Can the Javadoc-der
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > Can't you simply write a Make rule that will produce .info file
> [...]
> > Am I missing something?
>
> Yes. :-(
Well, perhaps you could describe in a few words how are the *.texi
files produced with the tools you use from whatever file(s) which
ser
> From: Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 02:25:35 -0800
>
> 1. A package builder may not have "makeinfo"
> 2. "make distcheck" assumes that it should never need to
> rebuild the .info, even if it reconstructs the .texi.
> (So it errors-out by failing to ``rm'' the
> Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:18:19 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Paul D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> BTW, while Eli Zaretskii is still providing excellent support for the
> DOS port of GNU make, it would be great if we had a few more pretesters
> for this port, as w
