Hello.
Is it possible to set the permission bits used by the default install
target in a Makefile.am?
To help try and illustrate what I mean, I present a code snippet from one
of my Makefie.am files.
>> Begin code snippet >>
gimpdir = ${prefix}
gimp_SCRIPTS = scaleAndSetSize.py
hich to accomplish this task
could you?
Thanks once again for all of your feedback - it is most appreciated.
Have a great day.
- Craig
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Craig,
>
> a couple of comments to the configure.ac script and Makefile.am
Lorenzo Bettini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
> Craig Sanders wrote:
>> Greetings Lorenzo.
>>
>> I have used the GNU Autotools in the past to build some simple
>> projects which made use of the Qt Library. I prefer to use the GNU
>> Autotools as I find them
.
The second one is the definition of the rule for running the moc on the
relevant source code files.
I hope all of this makes sense and that you find it helpful.
- Craig Sanders
Lorenzo Bettini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
> Hi
>
> I'd like to build a library that
X
AC_PROG_LEX
AC_OUTPUT([
Makefile
src/Makefile
])
<<<<<<<<<<
Also, for what it's worth, my Flex source file "simple.ll" looks as follows ;
>>>>>>>>>>
%{
#include
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
%}
%option noyywrap
%option c++
DIGIT [0-9]
HEAD_COMMAND_PACKET
TAIL_COMMAND_PACKET <\/command>
int numPackets = 0;
%%
{HEAD_COMMAND_PACKET}([[:graph:]]|[[:space:]])*{TAIL_COMMAND_PACKET} {
return(0);
}
%%
<<<<<<<<<<
I'm guessing my problem is being caused by my incorrect usage of one of the
Autotools, rather than ylwrap. If anyone could provide any assistance on this
matter it would be greatly appreciated.
Thankyou in advance.
- Craig Sanders
and shared wisdom is greatly
appreciated.
- Craig Sanders
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
> Hello Roberto,
>
> * Roberto Alejandro Espí Muñoz wrote on Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 05:25:03PM
> CEST:
>> Community: When I declare sources in each Make
ow about? Admittedly I did need to make some
small changes to my package's configure.ac file, because autoconf complained
when I ran it. Should I maybe have posted this message to the autoconf mailing
list instead?
Any help on this matter would be greatly appreciated.Thanks in advance for any
help.
- Craig Sanders
