ninja-style feature for make

not use any meta data about content, other than timestamps. I guess this may violate POSIX spec for make but it seems worthwhile for the speedup? -- Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai, Line: andy_tai, WeChat: andytai1010 Year 2021 民國110年 自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟 自動的行為力是勞動與技能

Re: Future plans for Autotools

NU projects. > > Bob > -- > Bob Friesenhahn > bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ > GraphicsMagick Maintainer,http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/ > Public Key, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/public-key.txt > -- Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai, Line: andy_tai, WeChat: andytai1010 Year 2021 民國110年 自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟 自動的行為力是勞動與技能

Re: Future plans for Autotools

GNU Make integrates with guile. Maybe such extension can be done using guile for flexibility? (ref: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Guile-Integration.html#Guile-Integration) On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:11 PM Paul Eggert wrote: > > One possible way forward is to have an Autocon

Re: Future plans for Autotools

My two cents: the competing build systems, cmake, meson, have in their "features" (and major motivation for their original development) of supporting Xcode and Microsoft Visual Studio. Supporting for these seem to become necessary for GNU Autotools to compete, even if these two may be outside of

Re: Future plans for Autotools

It seems better not to start another language. with already lack of resources, that will further dilate available resources, and hard to compete with other tools already us9ng Python's mature ecosystem On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:32 PM Bob Friesenhahn < bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote: > > In

Re: Put GNU build system files in a subdirectory?

distribution packagers cry? > > Because that's all I see on this list in the past two threads. > > -- > Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes > flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ > > -- Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai Year 2013 民國102年 自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟 自動的行為力是勞動與技能

Put GNU build system files in a subdirectory?

support.. for example, CMake's CMakefile.txt can coexist with GNU build files in a clean fashion -- Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai Year 2013 民國102年 自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟 自動的行為力是勞動與技能

Re: Funding and Feature Request Management For Open Source

en source developers really > helps us understand what's most important. If you have any questions, > just let me know. > > Cheers, > Boian > > > > -- > Boian Mihailov > > > > -- Andy Tai, a...@atai.org, Skype: licheng.tai Year 2013 民國102年 自動的精神力是信仰與覺悟 自動的行為力是勞動與技能

place automake files separately from source files

correcting the title -- Forwarded message -- From: Andy Tai Date: Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 11:07 AM Subject: please automake files separately from source files To: automake@gnu.org Hi, I wonder if there is a way to place the GNU autotools files in a source tree in a subdirectory

please automake files separately from source files

GNU automake system if they so desires and I do not overwrite the original non-automake Makefiles. Then how can I specify the sources files in source1,c, etc. Keep in mind that the original source tree may be complex with deep subdirectories of its own. Thanks, Andy -- Andy Tai, a...@atai.org

Re: Use automake for sources in subdirs?

On Mon, 17 July 2000, Tom Tromey wrote: > > Andy> I am trying to use automake 1.4 on an existing software package > Andy> whose source directory are organized as a set of subdirectories. > Andy> How can I write a makefile.am to automatically generate a > Andy> library file from these source files

Use automake for sources in subdirs?

Hi, I am new to automake, so please excuse me if this question is basic: I am trying to use automake 1.4 on an existing software package whose source directory are organized as a set of subdirectories. How can I write a makefile.am to automatically generate a library file from these source fil