Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Jacob,
AFAIU, the 4x sleep 0.1 are to determine whether
am_cv_filesystem_timestamp_resolution should be set to 0.1 or to 1.
OK, so be it.
But the 6x sleep 1 are to determine whether
am_cv_filesystem_timestamp_resolution should be set to 1 or 2.
2 is known to be the ca
Hi,
On 6/8/24 08:50, Bruno Haible wrote:
You can't achieve portability by using a highly unportable program
like 'stat'. That's why my patch only uses 'df' and 'mount'.
You can test if it's available, and fall back if not.
I don't care much about the 0.4 seconds spent on determining sub-sec
Hi,
The 1.16.90 NEWS file states:
- test-suite.log now contains basic system information, and the
console message about bug reporting on failure has a bit more detail.
(bug#68746)
1) This system information is the naked output of some OS commands:
(uname -a | awk '{$$2=""; p
Hi Jacob,
> > AFAIU, the 4x sleep 0.1 are to determine whether
> > am_cv_filesystem_timestamp_resolution should be set to 0.1 or to 1.
> > OK, so be it.
> >
> > But the 6x sleep 1 are to determine whether
> > am_cv_filesystem_timestamp_resolution should be set to 1 or 2.
> > 2 is known to be the c
Hello Autoconf,
hello Automake!
As promised yesterday, I wrote a first draft of an application to the
German Sovereign Tech Fund for Direct Contributions to both Autoconf &
Automake. Please review and comment. I would like to submit this next
week. Who needs to approve these (and any later ver
Bruno Haible wrote:
[I'm writing to automake@gnu.org because bug-autom...@gnu.org
appears to be equivalent to /dev/null: no echo in
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-automake/2024-06/threads.html
nor in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=automake,
even after several hours.]
I
Hi,
In my projects that use Automake and the "parallel" test driver, often
I have 1000 unit tests, of which 100-150 are skipped and 1-5 fail.
When analyzing the "make check" results, the generated test-suite.log
is more handy to use than the 1000 different .log files. However,
before I get an over
On 6/6/24 15:20, Christoph Grüninger wrote:
I think we should apply for the Bug Resilience Program with their Direct
Contributions option. This is not funding, rather a company is hired to
do the mentioned things. It is easier to apply for and if granted should
improve the situation.
Would it b
