Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, at 7:26 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Now that I have seen the actual patch, yes, this test should be
accurate. The test in the main autom4te script will also work, even
if there is a mismatch between the script and its library
Good.
This ap
Zack Weinberg wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, at 7:14 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
[snip everything addressed in the other thread]
Yes, there was a bit of confusion here; not only is the FileUtils
module synchronized between autom4te and automake
Thanks for rem
Features: subsecond-timestamps
Sounds good to me, FWIW. Thanks to all. -k
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, at 7:14 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
[snip everything addressed in the other thread]
> Yes, there was a bit of confusion here; not only is the FileUtils
> module synchronized between autom4te and automake
Thanks for reminding me that I need to make sure al
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023, at 7:26 PM, Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> Now that I have seen the actual patch, yes, this test should be
> accurate. The test in the main autom4te script will also work, even
> if there is a mismatch between the script and its library
Good.
> This appears to be misaligned with t
