On Sun, 2023-01-08 at 14:23 -0800, Dan Mahoney wrote:
> That makes sense Here's the fun, I can't find an easy way to say:
>
> (literally 159 tests).log : test-setup.log
What you might want to do is list the 159 tests in a multiline variable
defined in a seperate Automake fragment and then use the
> On Jan 8, 2023, at 10:55 AM, Kip Warner wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2023-01-08 at 04:31 -0800, Dan Mahoney wrote:
>> Hello,
>
> Hey Dan,
>
>> I’m one of the maintainers of OpenDKIM, dealing with an interesting
>> program where make -j is breaking some of our test programs.
>> Specifically, we have
On Sun, 2023-01-08 at 04:31 -0800, Dan Mahoney wrote:
> Hello,
Hey Dan,
> I’m one of the maintainers of OpenDKIM, dealing with an interesting
> program where make -j is breaking some of our test programs.
> Specifically, we have tests that *must* run first to generate keys,
> and *must* run last
Hello,
I’m one of the maintainers of OpenDKIM, dealing with an interesting program
where make -j is breaking some of our test programs. Specifically, we have
tests that *must* run first to generate keys, and *must* run last to do cleanup
tasks.
Is there an easy way with automake to force this
