Pádraig Brady skribis:
> On 22/12/15 17:00, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
>> There is ongoing discussion about reproducible builds within GNU. I'm
>> having trouble figuring out the best approach for deterministic
>> distribution archives using Automake.
>
> I've not thought much about this, but I'm
> won
On Dec 22, 2015, at 2:51 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
>
> Attempting to get archiving tools to produce the same results at different
> times on different machines is close to impossible
Fortunately, others have already done much of the hard work:
https://reproducible-builds.org/
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 22/12/15 17:00, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
There is ongoing discussion about reproducible builds within GNU. I'm
having trouble figuring out the best approach for deterministic
distribution archives using Automake.
I've not thought much about this, but I
On Dec 22, 2015, at 12:16 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>
> On 22/12/15 17:00, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
>> There is ongoing discussion about reproducible builds within GNU.
>
> I’m wondering about how useful deterministic tarballs are?
This page gives the “whys” of reproducible builds:
https://wiki.de
On 22/12/15 17:00, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> There is ongoing discussion about reproducible builds within GNU. I'm
> having trouble figuring out the best approach for deterministic
> distribution archives using Automake.
I've not thought much about this, but I'm
wondering about how useful determinist
There is ongoing discussion about reproducible builds within GNU. I'm
having trouble figuring out the best approach for deterministic
distribution archives using Automake.
Here's my original message on gnu-prog-discuss:
> I did read https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/archives/.
>
> Automake-ge
