Re: Rarely rebuilt files

On 2014-11-12 Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2014-11-12 21:58 +0200, fr33domlover wrote: > > On 2014-11-12 > > Nick Bowler wrote: > > > What is probably happening is that in VPATH builds from your tarball, > > > your documentation is being rebuilt even though it was distributed. > > > This is leaving f

Re: ${OBJEXT} in implicit rule

On Wednesday 2014-11-12 20:15, Nick Bowler wrote: >On 2014-11-12 16:58 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: >> Using automake-1.13.4, when using the following Makefile.am fragment, >> .k.${OBJEXT}: >> gcc -x c -c $< -o $@ >> I observe that bar.o is not built and not linked into foo. > >Indeed, the

Re: Rarely rebuilt files

On 2014-11-12 21:58 +0200, fr33domlover wrote: > On 2014-11-12 > Nick Bowler wrote: > > What is probably happening is that in VPATH builds from your tarball, > > your documentation is being rebuilt even though it was distributed. > > This is leaving files behind in your build directory, which dist

Re: Rarely rebuilt files

On 2014-11-12 Nick Bowler wrote: > Hello, > > On 2014-11-11 22:07 +0200, fr33domlover wrote: > > On 2014-11-11 > > Simon Richter wrote: > > > On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote: > > > > > > > When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get > > > > cleaned by `make

Re: Rarely rebuilt files

On 2014-11-11 Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 11.11.2014 22:02, fr33domlover wrote: > > >> If they are distributed, the distcheck target should not complain, > >> because it should expect the files to be there. > > > The files are not specified in any variable with 'dist_' prefix. They are >

Re: ${OBJEXT} in implicit rule

On 2014-11-12 16:58 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Using automake-1.13.4, when using the following Makefile.am fragment, > > ---8<--- > bin_PROGRAMS = foo > foo_SOURCES = foo.c bar.k > .k.${OBJEXT}: > gcc -x c -c $< -o $@ > --->8--- > > I observe that bar.o is not built and not linked int

${OBJEXT} in implicit rule

Using automake-1.13.4, when using the following Makefile.am fragment, ---8<--- bin_PROGRAMS = foo foo_SOURCES = foo.c bar.k .k.${OBJEXT}: gcc -x c -c $< -o $@ --->8--- I observe that bar.o is not built and not linked into foo. ---8<--- > make V=0 CC foo.o CCLD foo /usr/lib

Re: Rarely rebuilt files

Hello, On 2014-11-11 22:07 +0200, fr33domlover wrote: > On 2014-11-11 > Simon Richter wrote: > > On 11.11.2014 18:50, fr33domlover wrote: > > > > > When I ran `make distcheck`, it failed because the HTML files don't get > > > cleaned by `make distclean`. That makes sense, but specifically for my