Re: GNU Automake 1.14 released

2013-08-08 Thread Eric Dorland
* Dan Kegel (d...@kegel.com) wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Eric Dorland wrote: > >> That sounds kind of risky, promises of compatibility notwithstanding. > > > > Can you elaborate why? > > No. I'm just being paranoid. But there is good precedent for > paranoia being the right setting

Re: GNU Automake 1.14 released

2013-08-08 Thread Dan Kegel
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Eric Dorland wrote: >> That sounds kind of risky, promises of compatibility notwithstanding. > > Can you elaborate why? No. I'm just being paranoid. But there is good precedent for paranoia being the right setting in matters of backwards compatibility. > If the

Re: GNU Automake 1.14 released

2013-08-08 Thread Eric Dorland
* Dan Kegel (d...@kegel.com) wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Eric Dorland wrote: > > Previously I would upgrade the automake package to the latest version > > and add a new binary package for the previous version. So, for > > example, if automake was at version 1.10 and 1.11 was released

Re: GNU Automake 1.14 released

2013-08-08 Thread Dan Kegel
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Eric Dorland wrote: > Previously I would upgrade the automake package to the latest version > and add a new binary package for the previous version. So, for > example, if automake was at version 1.10 and 1.11 was released > upstream I would update the automake packa

Re: GNU Automake 1.14 released

2013-08-08 Thread Eric Dorland
* Eric Dorland (e...@debian.org) wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > I was just getting around to packaging this for Debian and I have a > question. Given the new versioning scheme shouldn't the APIVERSION (as > defined in configure.ac) be 1.13 and not 1.14? Or more precisely, does > it make sense for the bi

Re: subscription issue

2013-08-08 Thread Bob Proulx
Hello Rudra, Rudra Banerjee wrote: > I am a subscriber of this list, but there is no post delevered in my > account. I also get a automake bounce notice, as > "Your membership in the mailing list Automake has been disabled due to > excessive bounces ..." > I tried to reply the mail as directed on

subscription issue

2013-08-08 Thread Rudra Banerjee
Hello, I am a subscriber of this list, but there is no post delevered in my account. I also get a automake bounce notice, as "Your membership in the mailing list Automake has been disabled due to excessive bounces ..." I tried to reply the mail as directed on the same day, but got: "- Results: