Re: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is undefined

2012-11-08 Thread Bruce Korb
Hi Dave, Stefano, On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Dave Goodell wrote: > On Nov 8, 2012, at 1:19 PM CST, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > >> On 11/08/2012 07:56 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: >> I'd expect its definition to be brought in by the 'libtoolize' call >> issued by autoreconf; but then I see, in the o

Re: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is undefined

2012-11-08 Thread Dave Goodell
On Nov 8, 2012, at 1:19 PM CST, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 11/08/2012 07:56 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: >> >>> autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Libtool […] >>> lib/Makefile.am:31: error: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is undefined >>> lib/Makefile.am:31: The usual way to define 'LIBTOOL' is

Re: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is undefined

2012-11-08 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 11/08/2012 07:56 PM, Bruce Korb wrote: > automake is trying to tell me something, but I cannot make out exactly what. > The literal meaning of the messages is pretty clear, but what they caution > about are things that appear to me to be correct. > >> autoreconf --force --install --verbose --sy

Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is undefined

2012-11-08 Thread Bruce Korb
automake is trying to tell me something, but I cannot make out exactly what. The literal meaning of the messages is pretty clear, but what they caution about are things that appear to me to be correct. > autoreconf --force --install --verbose --symlink > autoreconf: Entering directory `.' > autore