[Dropping Automake-NG list, from the next reply]
On 09/24/2012 10:51 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> [MEGA-SNIP]
>
> Yes, because I don't want this to be Automake-NG only. But since
> this scheme is opt-in, the compile script "must" be adjusted to
> handle libhello.a anyway. And with an adjusted compi
> My kneejerk reaction is that Python would be a good language
> for Autoconf to deal with. The hard part would probably
> be writing the documentation -- is that something you
> could do? The idea would be to come up with a patch
> to the Autoconf sources.
Yes, that's no problem. I may have to
Severity: wishlist
On 09/25/2012 02:08 AM, Peter Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Peter. I'm moving this discussion to bug-automake so that we
won't forget about the issue.
> I just helped a co-developer who experienced a mysterious
>
> autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
> autoreconf: configure.ac:
