Il 11/07/2012 18:33, Russ Allbery ha scritto:
> To add one additional piece of information -- that rm was added because it
> was discovered that some of Autoconf's probes for working compilers and
> compiler properties would cause some buggy vendor compilers to core dump.
I wish it was just proble
Kenny Ho writes:
> I am trying to convert one of my existing project to use automake but
> after I run autoreconf and tried ./configure, I an "rm: cannot remove
> `core': Is a directory" error. So I look into ./configure and found "rm
> -f core" in the script. Now my project actually has a dire
On 07/11/2012 01:13 AM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Congratulations on this one too.
>
Thanks.
> Since what version has the security vulnerability existed?
>
Basically since "forever" - either the bug we've just fixed, or other
similar bugs (sometimes worse than it) were present in a way or another
On 07/10/2012 11:32 PM, Kenny Ho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to convert one of my existing project to use automake but after
> I run autoreconf and tried ./configure, I an "rm: cannot remove `core': Is a
> directory" error. So I look into ./configure and found "rm -f core" in the
> script.
>
In
Il 10/07/2012 23:32, Kenny Ho ha scritto:
>
> I am trying to convert one of my existing project to use automake but
> after I run autoreconf and tried ./configure, I an "rm: cannot remove
> `core': Is a directory" error. So I look into ./configure and found
> "rm -f core" in the script. Now my p
Hi,
I am trying to convert one of my existing project to use automake but after I
run autoreconf and tried ./configure, I an "rm: cannot remove `core': Is a
directory" error. So I look into ./configure and found "rm -f core" in the
script. Now my project actually has a directory name "core" b
