Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools?

2012-01-20 Thread NightStrike
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Miles Bader wrote: > For cleaning non-automake-handled stuff, you can add a "clean-local:" > rule (and "maintainer-clean-local:" etc) that does cleaning however > you want.  The automake-generated clean rule will depend on it, but > you control what it does.  For p

Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools?

2012-01-20 Thread Nick Bowler
Hi Stefano, On 2012-01-20 20:36 +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > On 01/19/2012 09:27 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > > [SNIP] > > > > Interestingly, if you actually stick a line exactly like the above into > > your Makefile.am, Automake will actually do "The Right Thing™" and > > creates the .Po stu

Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools?

2012-01-20 Thread Nick Bowler
On 2012-01-20 20:35 +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > Just a minor FYI and a minor question ... > > On 01/19/2012 09:27 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > > > > [SNIP] > > > >> What automake does for source files it knows about is just "include > >> $(DEPDIR)/srcfile.Po" (apparently "include" is considered

Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools?

2012-01-20 Thread Paul Smith
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 20:35 +0100, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > >> What automake does for source files it knows about is just "include > >> $(DEPDIR)/srcfile.Po" (apparently "include" is considered portable > >> make?). > > > > It's not considered portable make. > > > Still, it's worth noting that i

bug#10555: automake: wrong use of F77FLAGS instead of FFLAGS?

2012-01-20 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On 01/19/2012 02:45 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > [SNIP] > > So, to all autoconfers: do you happen to know any reason for which Automake > should use F77FLAGS? If not, I'll assume that is due to a typo or clerical > mistake, and fix it (in 48 hours or so). > The attached patch should take care

bug#10568: automake-1.11.1 1 of 643 tests failed

2012-01-20 Thread Dennis Clarke
= 1 of 643 tests failed (92 tests were not run) See tests/test-suite.log Please report to bug-autom...@gnu.org = dclarke@charon:~/build$ uname -a Linux charon 2.6.32-5-powerpc64 #1 SMP Wed Jan 11 15:39:26 UTC 2012 ppc64 GNU/L

Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools?

2012-01-20 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Hi Nick. On 01/19/2012 09:27 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > > [SNIP] > > Interestingly, if you actually stick a line exactly like the above into > your Makefile.am, Automake will actually do "The Right Thing™" and > creates the .Po stub as if you had actually specified the source file > normally. Presu

Re: allowing users to add source files without rerunning the autotools?

2012-01-20 Thread Stefano Lattarini
Just a minor FYI and a minor question ... On 01/19/2012 09:27 PM, Nick Bowler wrote: > > [SNIP] > >> What automake does for source files it knows about is just "include >> $(DEPDIR)/srcfile.Po" (apparently "include" is considered portable >> make?). > > It's not considered portable make. > Still,