Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release

2011-12-12 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/12/2011 11:17 AM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: On Monday 12 December 2011, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 12/10/2011 08:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: We are pleased to announce the Automake 1.11.1b test release. Stefano, Could you clarify, if this a pre-release/test-release of an upcoming autom

Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release

2011-12-12 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 12 December 2011, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/10/2011 08:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > We are pleased to announce the Automake 1.11.1b test release. > > Stefano, > > Could you clarify, if this a pre-release/test-release of an upcoming > automake-1.11.2 or an upcoming automake-1

Re: Automake 1.11.1b test release

2011-12-12 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 12/10/2011 08:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: We are pleased to announce the Automake 1.11.1b test release. Stefano, Could you clarify, if this a pre-release/test-release of an upcoming automake-1.11.2 or an upcoming automake-1.12 release? Ralf

Re: make dist-lzma and make dist-xz

2011-12-12 Thread Peter Rosin
Peter Rosin skrev 2011-12-12 10:14: > Hi! > > I noticed that the changes to "make dist-xz" to default to -e fixed > the xz.test on MinGW, but that lzma.test still fails (lzma: (stdin): Not > enough memory). Hoping to fix the last fail in the testsuite, I looked > into adding one something like LZM

make dist-lzma and make dist-xz

2011-12-12 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! I noticed that the changes to "make dist-xz" to default to -e fixed the xz.test on MinGW, but that lzma.test still fails (lzma: (stdin): Not enough memory). Hoping to fix the last fail in the testsuite, I looked into adding one something like LZMA_OPT or something to "make dist-lzma". But in m