Re: Modify $PATH for all subdirectories

Hello Justin, * Too, Justin A. wrote on Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:45:06PM CEST: > An executable is generated during 'make' in a directory called > scripts/test/install/bin. This executable is used during the > "check-local" rules in all of the Makefile.am's. In the top-level > Makefile.am, how can I

Modify $PATH for all subdirectories

Hi all, An executable is generated during 'make' in a directory called scripts/test/install/bin. This executable is used during the "check-local" rules in all of the Makefile.am's. In the top-level Makefile.am, how can I accomplish something like "export PATH=`pwd`/scripts/test/install/bin:$PAT

bug#8434: java: cannot use JAVA with both dist_ and nodist_ prefixes

Hello autoconfers. Currently, limitations in the Automake support for java enforce the restriction that only one `_JAVA' primary can be used in a given Makefile.am. Unfortunately, this (quite acceptable) limitation has the side effect that one cannot have both distributed and not distributed *.ja

bug#8234: check_JAVA built during make

On Wednesday 06 April 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: > On 04/06/2011 07:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > > The attached patch should fix the bug. The exposing testcase passes > > with the modification to automake.in installed, and fails without. > > > > OK for maint? I'll push in 72 hours if there i

bug#8234: check_JAVA built during make

On 04/06/2011 07:52 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > The attached patch should fix the bug. The exposing testcase passes > with the modification to automake.in installed, and fails without. > > OK for maint? I'll push in 72 hours if there is no objection. > My email address seems to have a longe

bug#8234: check_JAVA built during make

tags 8234 patch thanks [adding automake-patches] Hello Petteri. Thanks for the report, and sorry for the delay. On Saturday 12 March 2011, Petteri Räty wrote: > http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html > > "The special prefix ‘check_’ indicates that the objects in question > should not

[PATCH] {master} coverage: add tests on remake rules in more complex situations (was: Re: not breaking "make" after m4 macros and source files changed)

[adding automake-patches] [IMHO further answers can drop automake and bug-gnulib] Reference: On Sunday 03 April 2011, Bruno Haible wrote: > Hi Ralf, Stefano, > > > I'll make amend by writing the new testcases, if you can wait so