Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit

2011-03-19 Thread Robert Collins
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote: > ABSTRACT: > >  The Test Anything Protocol (TAP) is a simple text-based protocol >  that allows communication between test scripts and a test harness. ... > Now, in all honesty, I must say that I've chosen TAP not only for its > objective

Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project

2011-03-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
Pippijn wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:38:39AM +0100, Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use > > > automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be w

Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project

2011-03-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
Pippijn wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use > > automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be willing to > > co-mentor and work with them to convert NTP to that sort of opera

Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project

2011-03-19 Thread Harlan Stenn
Hi Ralf, Ralf wrote: > * Harlan Stenn wrote on Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 01:26:58AM CET: > > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use > > automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be willing to > > co-mentor and work with them to convert NTP to that sort of

Re: [GSoC Proposal] automake - Interfacing with a test protocol like TAP or subunit

2011-03-19 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Saturday 19 March 2011, Harlan Stenn wrote: > I'm curious/interested about the TAP effort, as it might tie in nicely > with some stuff we're working on for NTP: > > https://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Dev/GSoCProjectIdeas#Unit_tests > Nice! Having a real use case from the very beginning would be

Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project

2011-03-19 Thread Pippijn van Steenhoven
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:38:39AM +0100, Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use > > automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be willing to > > co-mentor

Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project

2011-03-19 Thread Pippijn van Steenhoven
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote: > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use > automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be willing to > co-mentor and work with them to convert NTP to that sort of operation. It's mostly trivi

Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project

2011-03-19 Thread Pippijn van Steenhoven
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:38:39AM +0100, Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 05:26:58PM -0700, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use > > automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be willing to > > co-mentor

Re: GSoC project idea: non-recursive automake project

2011-03-19 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Harlan, * Harlan Stenn wrote on Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 01:26:58AM CET: > If there was a student interested in showing how "easy" it was to use > automake to do non-recursive Makefiles for a project, I'd be willing to > co-mentor and work with them to convert NTP to that sort of operation. Thanks