Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support

2010-11-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Ralf Wildenhues writes: > OK. So IIUC one example dependency graph would be something like this: > > ( sin.go cos.go exp.go ) -> math.OBJEXT -> libfem.so > ( grid.go solver.go )-> sub/pdesolve.OBJEXT ---^ > > where the sets of .go files are distinct, the sets of object files > ("pack

Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support

2010-11-01 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Ralf Wildenhues writes: > [ dropping libtool@ ] > > * Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:48:03PM CET: >> Ralf Wildenhues writes: >> >> > We need a bit of new notation for this, and we need to teach automake >> > about languages that shouldn't have renamed objects even in the pres

Re: Bison and automake together

2010-11-01 Thread Philip Herron
Yeah this all seems like a bug to me, i dont do much C++ i prefer to use C so i havent used C++ bison parsers et'al . But yeah i have a few work arounds to get multiple bison and flex working i have some work i want to do to ylwrap to help it all but i really haven't got the time at the moment. Bas

Re: Bison and automake together

2010-11-01 Thread Paulo J. Matos
Pippijn van Steenhoven writes: > I solved this problem by adding my own y.tab.h which does nothing but > #include "scgparser.h". But unfortunately each time bison is ran, the file is overwritten it seems. :( -- PMatos

Re: Bison and automake together

2010-11-01 Thread Paulo J. Matos
Pippijn van Steenhoven writes: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:55:53PM +, Philip Herron wrote: >> Your bison file shouldnt generate any code with includes y.tab.h. You >> must have it in your field delcarations for bison. Its only your lexer >> needs to see these bison definitions. > > It does f

Re: [coreutils] debbugs

2010-11-01 Thread Glenn Morris
> > 1) Change the automake maintainer to bug-automake > > > > 2) Activate a router rule for bug-automake, that would redirect > > messages to debbugs.gnu.org. This should happen automatically once I > > add an entry to the appropriate config file on debbugs.gnu.org (has not > > been tested yet, b

heads-up: bug-automake will be bug-tracked

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Automake bug reporters, and sorry for the cross post, starting pretty soon, the bug-automake mailing list will be used to drive the GNU Bug Tracker for Automake, http://debbugs.gnu.org/automake so new messages to this list will automatically open new bug reports and replies to existing threa

Re: [coreutils] debbugs

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Glen, all, and sorry for the long delay, * Glenn Morris wrote on Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:54:45AM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues wrote (on Wed, 13 Oct 2010 at 22:46 +0200): > > > There is one question I haven't seen addressed yet, that I think should > > be documented: is it possible to easily expo

Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ dropping libtool@ ] * Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 09:48:03PM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues writes: > > > We need a bit of new notation for this, and we need to teach automake > > about languages that shouldn't have renamed objects even in the presence > > of per-object flags. > >

Re: PATCH RFA: Add Go support

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Ian, let's move this part of the discussion to the automake@ list. And sorry for delays, I cannot help that ATM. * Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 09:58:49PM CEST: > Ralf Wildenhues writes: > > * Ian Lance Taylor wrote on Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 07:31:04PM CEST: > >> Ralf Wilden

Re: User extensions

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote on Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 12:43:57PM CET: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:13:00PM +0200, Valentin David wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > > I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet, but will, now that > > > the assignment papers are

Re: User extensions

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Valentin, let's move to the -patches list. And sorry for the long delay. * Valentin David wrote on Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 06:56:53PM CEST: > I propose a patch as attached. > > * The lang_*_rewrite are added to the Language structure. The default > is lang_sub_obj. They do not return anymore th

Re: using autoconf with ppuxlc++,spuxlc++

2010-11-01 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* John Wohlbier wrote on Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 06:08:47PM CEST: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > How exactly do you invoke configure, what does configure output as > > dependency mechanism for these two compilers, where are the manpages > > for the compilers? > 1) I'm

Re: Bison and automake together

2010-11-01 Thread Philip Herron
On 1 November 2010 10:08, Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:14:49AM +, Philip Herron wrote: >> Then thats probably a bug although i havent played with GLR prarsers >> in bison you may want to post this to bison-help and see what they >> say. > > The thing is that bison

Re: User extensions

2010-11-01 Thread Pippijn van Steenhoven
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:13:00PM +0200, Valentin David wrote: > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Ralf Wildenhues > wrote: > > I haven't looked at the patch in detail yet, but will, now that > > the assignment papers are done (thanks!). > > It is done. Does this mean the feature will soon be i

Re: Bison and automake together

2010-11-01 Thread Pippijn van Steenhoven
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 02:14:49AM +, Philip Herron wrote: > Then thats probably a bug although i havent played with GLR prarsers > in bison you may want to post this to bison-help and see what they > say. The thing is that bison does produce the y.tab.h header, which it then assumes to exist