Re: Static libraries not following the libfoo.a naming convention

2010-09-23 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2010-09-23 20:59 skrev Ralf Wildenhues: > Hi Peter, > > * Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:01:16AM CEST: >> I have been wondering when I was going to run into this problem, > > Me too. :-) >> and >> now it has happened (in the Libtool testsuite, tests/demo-deplibs.test). > >> A

Re: confused about libtool and LIBADD

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Martin, * Martin Kalbfuss wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:08:36PM CEST: > If I do mylib_la_LIBADD = libSDL.la > > It says, > > make[1]: Entering directory > `/home/martin/Desktop/sk/schwarzerkaffee/src' > make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libSDL.la', needed by `libsk.la'. The idea is

Re: Static libraries not following the libfoo.a naming convention

2010-09-23 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Peter, * Peter Rosin wrote on Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:01:16AM CEST: > I have been wondering when I was going to run into this problem, Me too. > and > now it has happened (in the Libtool testsuite, tests/demo-deplibs.test). > Automake has rules for creating static libraries like so (taken fr

confused about libtool and LIBADD

2010-09-23 Thread Martin Kalbfuss
Hi, I try to use libtool for my project, It runs fine as long as libSDL is added as dependency to the program directly. But I thought, I could add a library as dependency of a library. But it isn't working. my wrapping library is libsk.la which depends on libSDL.la which is in my path. If I do my

Static libraries not following the libfoo.a naming convention

2010-09-23 Thread Peter Rosin
Hi! I have been wondering when I was going to run into this problem, and now it has happened (in the Libtool testsuite, tests/demo-deplibs.test). Automake has rules for creating static libraries like so (taken from that test case): EXTRA_LIBRARIES = libhell0.a libhell0_a_SOURCES = libhell0_a_LIB