Hello Roberto,
* Roberto Bagnara wrote on Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 11:32:45PM CEST:
> I am using Automake's simple test driver.
Are you using parallel-tests or not? Any setting for the variables
TESTS_ENVIRONMENT, LOG_COMPILER?
> I have three programs
> that, due to a buggy program transformation,
I am using Automake's simple test driver. I have three programs
that, due to a buggy program transformation, keep allocating
stack space until they segfault:
$ ulimit -s
8192
$ ./bug23
Segmentation fault
$ ./bug24
Segmentation fault
$ ./bug31
Segmentation fault
However:
$ make check
...
XPASS
On Saturday 21 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Apologies for the slightly off-topic message, but the German
> wikipedia entry for autotools contains a number of inaccuracies
> and bias against it.
FWIW, this is true also for the English wikipedia entry for autoconf
(but *not* for the automa
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
So long ago already ...
Slow but sure ...
For some of the OSs the time is about the same if the directory is
already cleaned, while for others (e.g. OS-X) the time improves
considerably if the directory is already clean.
Here's a first patch I'm
So long ago already ...
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:26:14PM CEST:
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>Is there a way to make this quite a lot faster?
> >
> >The LTLIBRARIES bits: yes, noted. The PROGRAMS bits should be
> >reasonably fast already, only forking
Apologies for the slightly off-topic message, but the German wikipedia
entry for autotools contains a number of inaccuracies and bias against
it. I consider myself biased so I won't edit it, but would be delighted
to see someone setting things straight, trying to avoid bias.
If you have questions
