On Thursday 19 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:39:29PM CEST:
> > On Wednesday 18 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > I suppose automake could be enhanced to also define $(OBJECTS)
> > > as the set of all objects.
> >
> > What about l
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:39:29PM CEST:
> On Wednesday 18 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I suppose automake could be enhanced to also define $(OBJECTS) as
> > the set of all objects.
> What about libtool objects? Should we care about them? I'm writing a
> coupl
Hello Ralf.
On Wednesday 18 August 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I suppose automake could be enhanced to also define $(OBJECTS) as
> the set of all objects.
What about libtool objects? Should we care about them? I'm writing a
couple of (xfailing) testcases to check a prospective patch introduci
On 08/18/10 20:34, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 03:42:01PM CEST:
On Wednesday 18 August 2010, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
On 08/18/10 13:18, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
At Wednesday 18 August 2010, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
>> #$(TESTS:=...@objext@): ../../
