Hello,
* Paul Smith wrote on Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 04:33:46AM CEST:
> On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > # old fashioned suffix rule, portable
> > > .xcf.bmp:
> > > $(GIMP) -i -b '(xcf-bmp "$<" "$@")' -b '(gimp-quit 0)'
> > >
> > > Hey, maybe Automake hac
On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 23:32 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > # old fashioned suffix rule, portable
> > .xcf.bmp:
> > $(GIMP) -i -b '(xcf-bmp "$<" "$@")' -b '(gimp-quit 0)'
> >
> > Hey, maybe Automake hackers can riff off this thread in time for
> > the next release... (or, "Would yo
() Ralf Wildenhues
() Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:32:44 +0200
Yes, with a general example, please.
I am unsure what "general example" means, precisely, so
the patch below simply uses the one in The GNU Make Manual.
Is that ok?
_
>From 7b70f8b27057c
* Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote on Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 07:02:21PM CEST:
> Probably Automake manual (and its readers)
> could benefit from changing the mysterious:
>
> We do not discuss pattern rules here because they are not
> portable, but they can be convenient in packages that assume GNU
> `mak
() "samson.pierre"
() Sun, 15 Aug 2010 03:09:50 +0200 (CEST)
> > %.bmp: %.xcf
> > $(GIMP) -i -b '(xcf-bmp "$<" "$@")' -b '(gimp-quit 0)'
Is there an equivalent or anything else which can help me to write this
rule avoiding this warning message?
I think here you can use something lik
On 8/14/2010 7:09 PM, samson.pierre wrote:
>
> Yes it works :-)
>
> But I see a little warning when I call autoreconf :
> `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension
>
> I think it is because I use this character ‘%’ in my rules. But this ‘%’ is
> very interesting to define an implicit rules
