I apologize for that unintentional reposting in my previous e-mail with this
same subject.
Youssef Eldakar
Bibliotheca Alexandrina
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Justin Seyster wrote:
My hope is that this approach will protect users of the framework from
the most possible hidden linking danger.
Since 9/11, 'hope' is not sufficient protection in today's world.
Not all systems are capable of producing a 'partial' library, leaving
so
Thanks, this advice gives me exactly what I asked for (even if it
turns out that's not what I really wanted :-).
I agree entirely that putting the framework into the main program is a
good solution, but I'm not involved with the main program's
development, so that's not an option for me.
Right no
> Probably no curtains, but they do have windshield wiper to clear away
the cruft.
The light rail trolleys around where I live also have pull-down sun
shades to protect the driver from glare. :-)
/me will stop now
---
William Tracy
Steffan,
On 2/3/2010 5:50 AM, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:33 AM, John Calcote wrote:
(PIC-based static only) library is to use the "noinst" prefix. But libtool
can be used to manually install a convenience library, so you could use
libtool to do this in an install-exec-
Hello Sylvestre,
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
In my Makefile.am, I have:
all-local: macros
macros: $(top_builddir)/bin/myscript
$(top_builddir)/bin/myscript $(top_builddir)/dataDir/myData.sci
Obviously, this works when I am building my application in the source
tree but it fails when buildin
John Calcote wrote:
> On 1/29/2010 10:17 AM, Steffen Dettmer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
>>> Regarding silent installs: Why do passenger trains have windows?
>> Why do passenger train windows have curtains?
> Okay - I can't help it! I bet the engineer's windows don't
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
Therefore, the safest way is to link your "framework" into main
process (and only into main process) and let the main process to
provide these "framework" functions to the modules loaded by him.
I find it convenient to have loadable modules depend o
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:33 AM, John Calcote wrote:
> (PIC-based static only) library is to use the "noinst" prefix. But libtool
> can be used to manually install a convenience library, so you could use
> libtool to do this in an install-exec-local rule in the Makefile.am file
> that builds (for i
Hello,
I am trying to enable the VPATH path build of a software.
The whole compilation process is fine but I am stuck at the end of the
process.
I need to call a script to finish the build process. This script will be
run against data files.
In my Makefile.am, I have:
all-local: macros
macros:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 03:39, Justin Seyster wrote:
> I'm working on a support framework for plug-ins, and I'm struggling to
> come up with a way to compile it. I'm leaning towards building it as
> a convenience library, but there a few SNAFUs.
>
> Each plug-in is itself a shared library. I woul
I have a package that uses Perl modules that I would like installed in @INC,
e.g., in /usr/share/perl5. Searching through the Automake list archives, the
most relevant thread I was able to locate was:
http://sourceware.org/ml/automake/2003-05/msg00069.html
However, the solution suggested therein
12 matches
Mail list logo
