Re: The New parallel-tests Framework (was: Various testsuites)

2009-05-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bob, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:54:02AM CEST: > On Thu, 21 May 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > >> 6. Dependencies between Tests >> = >> >> If there are dependencies between your tests, e.g., foo.test needs to be >> run before baz.chk can be run

Re: The New parallel-tests Framework (was: Various testsuites)

2009-05-21 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: 6. Dependencies between Tests = If there are dependencies between your tests, e.g., foo.test needs to be run before baz.chk can be run, then, with TEST_EXTENSIONS set as above, you can now go ahead and specify them as depen

Re: The New parallel-tests Framework (was: Various testsuites)

2009-05-21 Thread NightStrike
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello once again, > > allow me to expand upon this topic a bit more.  In this message, I will > not try to be fair towards the different test suite frameworks; instead, > I'll bluntly praise the new parallel-tests driver.  :-) > >> Automake

The New parallel-tests Framework (was: Various testsuites)

2009-05-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello once again, allow me to expand upon this topic a bit more. In this message, I will not try to be fair towards the different test suite frameworks; instead, I'll bluntly praise the new parallel-tests driver. :-) > Automake TESTS support, as of version 1.11, consists of two different > test

Re: mailing list handling (was: My project can't use `silent-rules')

2009-05-21 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Thu, 21 May 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: It seems not easy to please you. :-) I am a PITA. :-) A while ago you (IMHO rightfully) complained about too much email coming your way, with duplicates due to cross-posting to more than one mailing list increasing the pressure even more. I can o

mailing list handling (was: My project can't use `silent-rules')

2009-05-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Bob, all, * Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:43:51PM CEST: > > P.S. I am pretty pissed that almost all recent discussion of automake > major features and direction has apparently taken place on the > automake-patches list rather than the automake list where it belongs. > N