Re: improve INSTALL contents (was: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su')

2009-05-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Eric, thanks for pursuing this. * Eric Blake wrote on Wed, May 13, 2009 at 02:51:34PM CEST: > @@ -156,7 +158,25 @@ Installation Names > In addition, if you use an unusual directory layout you can give options > like @option{--bind...@var{dir}} to specify different values for > particular ki

Re: improve INSTALL contents

2009-05-13 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
>+Depending on the package, the default directory layout chosen during >+...@command{configure} can be altered during subsequent execution of >+...@command{make}. > > A `make install FOO=VAL' should never alter anything in the build > directory. The problem is if y

לכולנו לפתוח את הלב לשאת תפי לה ולעזור

2009-05-13 Thread Hidabroot America
לכולנו לפתוח את הלב לשאת תפילה ולעזור, סיון שלח/ה לך תוכן מאתר mako שהוא חושב שיעניין אותך. לצפייה בתוכן, אנא הקלק על http://www.mako.co.il/tv-ilana_dayan/2009-b456ae2c64031210/Article-dd9fb305b853121006.htm אשחר כולנו מאחלים לך החלמה מהירה שתתרפא במהרה כדרך נס כאילו המחלה מעולם לא הייתה בברכה,

Re: improve INSTALL contents

2009-05-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Alfred M. Szmidt on 5/13/2009 7:22 AM: >+Depending on the package, the default directory layout chosen during >+...@command{configure} can be altered during subsequent execution of >+...@command{make}. > > A `make install FO

Re: improve INSTALL contents (was: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su')

2009-05-13 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
+Depending on the package, the default directory layout chosen during +...@command{configure} can be altered during subsequent execution of +...@command{make}. A `make install FOO=VAL' should never alter anything in the build directory. The problem is if you pass --bindir=/foo to confi

improve INSTALL contents (was: Core-utils 7.2; building only 'su')

2009-05-13 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Eric Blake on 4/15/2009 5:51 AM: >> Maybe the generic INSTALL file should provide pointers to more >> comprehensive documentation? > > I tend to agree that INSTALL should either mention DESTDIR (and probably > also V, which now plays a ro