Re: Compilation order

* Paul Smith wrote on Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 11:11:20PM CET: > On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 21:50 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > I'm not sure whether it's fixed. I think it's first mentioned here, > > which also points to some bug numbers: > >

Re: Compilation order

On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 21:50 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > I'm not sure whether it's fixed. I think it's first mentioned here, > which also points to some bug numbers: > Ah. Yes, that's fixed. > You can try GraphicsMagick for

Re: Compilation order

Hi Paul, * Paul Smith wrote on Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:18:15PM CET: > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 22:06 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > BTW, while you're here, is there chance for a new GNU make release > > soonish with the bug fixed that prevented GCC from using dependency > > tracking? (IIRC it dea

Re: Compilation order

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 22:06 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > BTW, while you're here, is there chance for a new GNU make release > soonish with the bug fixed that prevented GCC from using dependency > tracking? (IIRC it dealt with order-only deps.) Hi Ralf; sorry for the delay. Is this bug already

Re: cyclic dependancy

* Neel Basu wrote on Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:29:07PM CET: > This is my current version of cgixx/cgi++/jsutil/Makefile.am > INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/cgi++ > METASOURCES = AUTO > noinst_HEADERS = NOT-MENTIONED > lib_LTLIBRARIES = libcgixx-jsutil.la > libcgixx_jsutil_la_SOURCES = NOT-MENTIONED > lib

Re: cyclic dependancy

This is my current version of cgixx/cgi++/jsutil/Makefile.am INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/cgi++ METASOURCES = AUTO noinst_HEADERS = NOT-MENTIONED lib_LTLIBRARIES = libcgixx-jsutil.la libcgixx_jsutil_la_SOURCES = NOT-MENTIONED libcgixx_jsutil_la_LIBADD = $(top_builddir)/cgi++/libcgixx.la libcgixx_jsut

Re: fast install released already?

Hello Markus, Christopher, * Duft Markus wrote on Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:15:56AM CEST: > > > we currently use automake 1.9.6, and it would be best if > > > we don't have to touch any of our files (autoconf 2.59, libtool > > 1.5.24, > > > m4 1.4.4), is this possible? > > > > That's a bit tough.

Re: Checking for a library ... different ways ...

Hello Michel, Matěj, * Matěj Týč wrote on Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 04:13:49PM CEST: > > > Adding to that the check could be implemented in many different ways : > > an autoconf macro, calling a script (sdl-config for example), using > > pkgconfig... > > Stick with AC_CHECK_LIBS, see reasons below. T

Re: cyclic dependancy

Hello Neel, please do not top-post. If you don't know what that is, google for "top posting". * Neel Basu wrote on Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:12:20AM CET: > Now this is my cgixx/cgi++/jsutil/Makefile.am > 1. INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/cgi++ > 2. METASOURCES = AUTO > 3. noinst_HEADERS = NOT-METIONED