Re: pkg-config, anyone?

2008-10-10 Thread Matěj Týč
Thank you for your reply, Braden, > > I am particulary searching for a manner how to specify the library > > name > > in a smart way since libtool can be very creative when decorating the > > library name (if you use the -version-number etc. options). > > You don't use that information when lin

Re: pkg-config, anyone?

2008-10-10 Thread Matěj Týč
Thank you for your reply, Dan > And where is the problem? E.g. > > Name: @PACKAGE@ > This does not work. I need a name of the library that libtool produces in the end... > and then process the .pc.in by configure (AC_CONFIG_FILES). If you don't want > to > use $PACKAGE, well then use some self

Re: pkg-config, anyone?

2008-10-10 Thread Braden McDaniel
On Oct 10, 2008, at 2:28 PM, Matěj Týč wrote: Hello friends, I would like to inquire whether there is someone here that generates .pc files in his autotools-powered project (presumably a project containing libraries). The most common way to do it is to process the file with configure/ c

Re: pkg-config, anyone?

2008-10-10 Thread Daniel Leidert
Matěj Týč wrote: > Hello friends, > I would like to inquire whether there is someone here that generates .pc > files in his autotools-powered project (presumably a project containing > libraries). > I am particulary searching for a manner how to specify the library name > in a smart way since libt

pkg-config, anyone?

2008-10-10 Thread Matěj Týč
Hello friends, I would like to inquire whether there is someone here that generates .pc files in his autotools-powered project (presumably a project containing libraries). I am particulary searching for a manner how to specify the library name in a smart way since libtool can be very creative when

Re: Cross-compiling with automake

2008-10-10 Thread Thomas Epperson
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I don't think your issue has to do with automake at all; it rather looks > like a GCC issue. I can't tell if all you need is to use '-Wl,' or if > there is some limitation in the gcc driver that you need to work around. >