Re: Installation of startup scripts

2008-07-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:39:00PM CEST: > > Is there a proper automake way of installing startup scripts? > > Try > init_d_dir = $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d > init_d_dir_SCRIPTS = blah The last line should've been init_d_SCRIPTS = blah Sorry about that. Cheers, R

Re: Installation of startup scripts

2008-07-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Vikram, * Vikram Ambrose wrote on Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:38:04PM CEST: > install: That should've been install-exec-local. >install -D -m 755 $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/blah > > uninstall: >rm $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/blah > > Is there a proper automake way of installing startup sc

Installation of startup scripts

2008-07-16 Thread Vikram Ambrose
Currently I have to add my own rule install: install -D -m 755 $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/blah uninstall: rm $(sysconfdir)/rc.d/init.d/blah Is there a proper automake way of installing startup scripts? Vikram.

Re: Profiled-arc builds?

2008-07-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 05:01:28PM CEST: > On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: >>> execution. Is this within the realm of possibility for future Automake? >> >> No idea. How are you doing it now? > > I am not doing it now, but an example of its successful use is in

Re: Profiled-arc builds?

2008-07-16 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: execution. Is this within the realm of possibility for future Automake? No idea. How are you doing it now? I am not doing it now, but an example of its successful use is in the GCC build when built via 'make profiledbootstrap'. For the last sev

Re: Inproper actions when version.texi is used

2008-07-16 Thread Raja R Harinath
Hi, Herbert Euler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I encountered a problem using version.texi with GNU make: after > changing the version of my project in configure.in GNU make has to be > executed twice to get the correct version number in the info document. > I had sent a mail to the bug-make mail