It is flex and bison renaming the generated symbols, mainly I was
wondering about how if one has foo.y and foo.l in the same directory for
sources, one will end up with foo.c which will contain only one of the
generated files, and this occurs without a printed message. However,
thank you for your a
Christian Csar wrote:
> Is there anyway to control the behavior of ylwrap? The project I am
> converting has its parsers use files like foo.l and foo.y for the lex
> and yacc files as they go together, and automake then converts both of
> these to foo.c, overwriting the first seemingly silently. A
Is there anyway to control the behavior of ylwrap? The project I am
converting has its parsers use files like foo.l and foo.y for the lex
and yacc files as they go together, and automake then converts both of
these to foo.c, overwriting the first seemingly silently. Admittedly I
solved this by chan
Hi everybody,
my current task is to get some testcases for a library compiling - the
directory structure is that the testcases should exist completely
independently from the source directory of the library. Each testcase has
its own subdirectory seen from the root directory. The binary(ies) of t
