Andreas,
Andreas Schwab wrote:
John Calcote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The way you implement this is to use $(prefix)/lib, or $(libdir) in your
-R option, which will resolve to the configured library installation
directory - /home/bob/foo/lib. When you use -R like this, however, just
realize
John Calcote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The way you implement this is to use $(prefix)/lib, or $(libdir) in your
> -R option, which will resolve to the configured library installation
> directory - /home/bob/foo/lib. When you use -R like this, however, just
> realize that this binary can only b
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 09:19:00AM -0600, John Calcote wrote:
> Bob Rossi wrote:
>> Will it only work if I install with the default installation directory?
>> What if I change the --prefix=/home/bob/foo. Will /home/bob/foo/bin/bar
>> be able to find /home/bob/foo/lib/wxwidgets.so ?
>>
> If you
Bob Rossi wrote:
Will it only work if I install with the default installation directory?
What if I change the --prefix=/home/bob/foo. Will /home/bob/foo/bin/bar
be able to find /home/bob/foo/lib/wxwidgets.so ?
If you install libraries into a "non-standard" location, you're going to
have the
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 08:55:27AM -0600, John Calcote wrote:
> Bob Rossi wrote:
>> If I put it in the lib directory on other platforms, on startup, how
>> will the binary know where to find the .so? That's why I was asking
>> about LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and creating a script
>>
> Okay, let me as
Bob Rossi wrote:
If I put it in the lib directory on other platforms, on startup, how
will the binary know where to find the .so? That's why I was asking
about LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and creating a script
Okay, let me ask a few questions to clarify your situation. First, is
this library being l
On 4/3/08, Bob Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 08:36:44AM -0600, John Calcote wrote:
> > Bob,
> >> On linux, there is no such guarentee. So, I have come up with 2
> >> solutions, and wonder if someone else has a better idea, or prefers one
> >> over the others.
> >>
> >>
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 08:36:44AM -0600, John Calcote wrote:
> Bob,
>> On linux, there is no such guarentee. So, I have come up with 2
>> solutions, and wonder if someone else has a better idea, or prefers one
>> over the others.
>>
>> - Modify the automake to build the program as foo-bin, inste
Bob,
Bob Rossi wrote:
On windows, the dll goes into the bin dir, and the program uses the
proper dll. This is something that windows does reasonably well.
I'm not against Windows, but what makes you think Windows does it the
right way? Actually, the Win32 SxS (side-by-side) cache is the bes
Hi,
I'm building an application that links to wxwidgets. I want to allow
wxwidgets to be built both statically (.a) and dynamically (.so).
This program builds on a variety of platforms, including linux and
mingw.
If I choose to build a static wxwidgets library, deployment is easy
on both linux a
10 matches
Mail list logo
