Hello Vincent,
* Vincent Torri wrote on Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:40:32AM CET:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >Do you want the static library built at all? If not, try
> > libfoo_la_LIBTOOLFLAGS = --tag=disable-static
>
> indeed, I don't want static lib at all. So using that t
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote on Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:38:48PM CET:
() Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
() Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:17:12 +0100 (CET)
a library that I use installs shared libs that will be
loaded with dlopen. That is, the static lib,
Am Dienstag, den 12.02.2008, 10:39 -0500 schrieb db:
> I am trying to run automake command in Fedora 7 (automake 1.10). Automake
> fails due to GNU make extension:
>
> priv/Makefile.am:52: shell cat $(srcdir: non-POSIX variable name
> priv/Makefile.am:52: (probably a GNU make extension)
>
> Mak
* db wrote on Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:39:58PM CET:
> I am trying to run automake command in Fedora 7 (automake 1.10). Automake
> fails due to GNU make extension:
>
> priv/Makefile.am:52: shell cat $(srcdir: non-POSIX variable name
> priv/Makefile.am:52: (probably a GNU make extension)
Unless -We
I am trying to run automake command in Fedora 7 (automake 1.10). Automake
fails due to GNU make extension:
priv/Makefile.am:52: shell cat $(srcdir: non-POSIX variable name
priv/Makefile.am:52: (probably a GNU make extension)
Makefile.am content, where the problem is:
$(shell cat $(srcdir)/test_c
Oops, sorry...wrong mailing list O.o
--rob
On Feb 12, 2008 11:44 AM, Rob Desbois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to have a portion of my makefile similar to this:
>tests/%: tests/%.cpp tests/runner.cpp
>tests/test-x: x.cpp x.h
>
> I have several targets in tests/ which all have similar
I want to have a portion of my makefile similar to this:
tests/%: tests/%.cpp tests/runner.cpp
tests/test-x: x.cpp x.h
I have several targets in tests/ which all have similar core
dependencies, hence the pattern rule.
Some of them have additional dependencies, hence the second rule.
The pat
() Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
() Tue, 12 Feb 2008 13:36:29 +0100
Please, do not propagate ugly solutions, unless you
know that a clean one does not exist.
It's hard to know if a clean one does not exist; i
don't maintain these tools and don't generally dig
into them more deeply tha
* Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote on Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:38:48PM CET:
> () Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> () Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:17:12 +0100 (CET)
>
>a library that I use installs shared libs that will be
>loaded with dlopen. That is, the static lib, the .la
>files (and the import lib
() Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
() Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:17:12 +0100 (CET)
a library that I use installs shared libs that will be
loaded with dlopen. That is, the static lib, the .la
files (and the import lib *.dll.a on windows) are not
necessary.
Is there a command to add in a
Hey,
a library that I use installs shared libs that will be loaded with dlopen.
That is, the static lib, the .la files (and the import lib *.dll.a on
windows) are not necessary.
Is there a command to add in a Makefile.am to avoid the installation of
those file, so that only the sahred lib i
11 matches
Mail list logo
