Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
>> A big difference between Automake projects and building the Linux
>> kernel is that building the linux kernel is practically assured to
>> succeed where as building Automake projects may fail and require
>> correction by the en
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 05:34:19PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> >A big difference between Automake projects and building the Linux kernel
> >is that building the linux kernel is practically assured to succeed where
> >as building Automake projects
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
A big difference between Automake projects and building the Linux kernel is
that building the linux kernel is practically assured to succeed where as
building Automake projects may fail and require correction by the end user
(who needs to see what is
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, Johannes Bauer wrote:
Hello list,
how can I modify the output of an Automake project so that it does not
display the whole command line, but simply the short version like the
Linux Kernel does, e.g.:
CC init/version.o
CC init/do_mounts.o
LD init/mounts.o
Hello list,
how can I modify the output of an Automake project so that it does not
display the whole command line, but simply the short version like the
Linux Kernel does, e.g.:
CC init/version.o
CC init/do_mounts.o
LD init/mounts.o
CC init/initramfs.o
CC init/c
Thanks for the tips and the guidance. I followed your advice and finally mi
files were:
configure.ac:
AC_INIT([hmi], [0.3], [EMAIL PROTECTED])
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wall -Werror foreign])
AC_PROG_CXX
AC_CONFIG_FILES([
Makefile
src/Makefile
])
AC_OUTPUT
Makefile.am:
SUBDIRS = src
src/Mak
