Hello Jeff,
* Jeff Safier wrote on Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 06:12:48PM CET:
> Is there any way to link a shared object (or .la file) created with
> libtool (through automake) without hardcoding a path when specifying the
> file in the program_LDADD line
On many systems, libtool will not hard-code run
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Bob Proulx wrote on Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:37:56PM CET:
> > With a use model more like this somewhat stylized example.
> [...]
> > ...modify code generator...
> > make moreclean
> > make
>
> Looks to me like if your generated code had proper dependencies you
> wou
Is there any way to link a shared object (or .la file) created with
libtool (through automake) without hardcoding a path when specifying the
file in the program_LDADD line
Jeff Safier
Cornell-Mayo Associates
600 Lanidex Plaza
Parsipanny, NJ 07054
(973) 887-3069 ext. 119
Hello Bob,
quick reply upon a glance:
* Bob Proulx wrote on Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:37:56PM CET:
[...]
>
> <-- less clean -- more clean -->
> MOSTLYCLEANFILES
> CLEANFILES
> MORECLEANFILES
> DISTCLEANFILES
> MAINTAINERCLEANFILES
>
>
Perrog wrote:
> 2007/2/28, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >I would really like a clean target that would remove generated source
> >files such as generated .c and .h files. In the case of yacc and lex
> >I would like to distribute the generated files so as not to require
> >the use of yacc and
Hi!
2007/2/28, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I would really like a clean target that would remove generated source
files such as generated .c and .h files. In the case of yacc and lex
I would like to distribute the generated files so as not to require
the use of yacc and lex to compile the di
