Hello Akim,
* Akim Demaille wrote on Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 05:56:16PM CET:
>
> For the records, I could use AM_LIBADD as a default value of
> libfoo_la_LIBADD. Currently it is not recognized.
LIBS is not enough? (If you care about allowing the user to set it,
you could add your stuff to @[EMAIL
Hello Peter,
Thanks for the report.
* Peter Klein wrote on Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:22:32PM CET:
>
> this weekend I took version 1.10 of automake and compiled it on various
> of my Sun workstations. I was asked to report bugs. If youl'd like to
> get further info for a detailed analysis, please l
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 23:46, you wrote:
> Mick -
>
> This was very helpful. It got me off the ground and now I think I'm
> about 90% there. What I'm struggling with now is circular dependencies
> in libraries. In the old Makefile for this software they dealt with this
> in this fashion:
> -Wl,--start-
Hello Jim, Mick,
* Jim Rainville wrote on Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:46:12PM CET:
>
> This was very helpful. It got me off the ground and now I think I'm
> about 90% there. What I'm struggling with now is circular dependencies
> in libraries. In the old Makefile for this software they dealt with thi
Mick -
This was very helpful. It got me off the ground and now I think I'm
about 90% there. What I'm struggling with now is circular dependencies
in libraries. In the old Makefile for this software they dealt with this
in this fashion:
-Wl,--start-group -Wl,--end-group
With autoconf/automake th
