Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 08:36 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello Ralf, > > * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:28:45AM CEST: > > > > I know it's not implemented in automake-1.8/1.9, but I thought > > this was fixed in HEAD;) > > You were right though, sorry about that. Dependency

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello Ralf, * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 08:28:45AM CEST: > > I know it's not implemented in automake-1.8/1.9, but I thought > this was fixed in HEAD;) You were right though, sorry about that. Dependency tracking is implemented in 1.9b. There is however an open issue wrt. sub

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 08:25 +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:49:00AM CEST: > > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > > > What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre > > > processed) Assembler

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-10 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Corsepius wrote on Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:49:00AM CEST: > On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre > > processed) Assembler files (the .S ones)? I've seen some bits of > > discussions about

Re: Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 17:55 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hello! > > What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre > processed) Assembler files (the .S ones)? I've seen some bits of > discussions about this in various places, but no final conclusion so far. Check aut

Re: automake/492: Compilation of assembler files with subdir-objects

2006-10-10 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 16:15 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > [Cced to and for further > discussion. Which list is appropriate here?] automake, is the correct list. This is an automake issue. > > Hello! > > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > > http://sources.redh

Dependency tracking of pre processed Assembler files

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! What's the deal with making Automake support dependency tracking for (pre processed) Assembler files (the .S ones)? I've seen some bits of discussions about this in various places, but no final conclusion so far. Regards, Thomas signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: automake/492: Compilation of assembler files with subdir-objects

2006-10-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
[Cced to and for further discussion. Which list is appropriate here?] Hello! On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 06:09:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=automake&pr=492 It's been some time, but this issue is still outstandi