RFC: "Autotools Introduction" chapter draft (16 pages long)

2006-08-12 Thread Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Hi Folks, I need your help! Over the last weeks I've been writing an introductory chapter for the Automake manual. Now I could use some proofreading eyes, especially since I'm a foreigner. Other suggestions welcome too, of course. My objective is (at least) threefold: - I want to present to

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > New platforms are introduced very slowly (and more slowly every year). This is not my experience. I have to update config.{sub,guess} for a new platform at user request at least once a year, whereas changed platform names have never caused a problem

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Bob Proulx wrote: I think someone reading your response will then be scared to update the config.guess because you say it breaks a matched set. But I think that fear is unwarranted and in most cases the script *must* be updated in order to work on new platforms. New platf

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-12 Thread Bob Proulx
Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > It may be considered a good thing to some, but it is not necessarily a > good thing. Consider that the rest of the build package (e.g. > libtool) is expecting particular host identifications and that > sometimes the behavior of these scripts change. Only very rarely wi

Re: config.guess comments from our sysadmins

2006-08-12 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Bob Proulx wrote: The point of this is that automatically updating the config.guess and config.sub scripts is considered a good thing. It may be considered a good thing to some, but it is not necessarily a good thing. Consider that the rest of the build package (e.g. li