* David Everly wrote on Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 12:56:12AM CEST:
>
> I think my problem happens because what our vendor does is #include
> inside of rw/numbrw
Yes, I see that too with the compiler version I'm looking at.
> Thus, you get deps like this:
>
> rw/numbrw: rw/numbrw.cc
> rw/numbrwcc:
Thanks for responding Ralf,
On 8/7/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello David,
* David Everly wrote on Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:54:52PM CEST:
> The automake documentation...
[...]
> ...indicates:
>
> "Automake always uses complete dependencies for a compilation,
> including syste
Hello David,
* David Everly wrote on Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 09:54:52PM CEST:
> The automake documentation...
[...]
> ...indicates:
>
> "Automake always uses complete dependencies for a compilation,
> including system headers."
Yes. That may be debatable to some point, but this:
> However, a clos
The automake documentation...
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_mono/automake.html#Dependencies
...indicates:
"Automake always uses complete dependencies for a compilation,
including system headers."
However, a closed-source vendor gives us header files that contain:
#include
> > A quick question, I would like to be able to change one compilation flag
> > for one file.
> > I have a few fortran files which don't work (but can be compiled) with
> > the optimisation flag (-O).
>
> You can use per-target flags for this, if you have to.
> (I say "if you have to", because in
Hello Sylvestre,
* Sylvestre Ledru wrote on Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 03:17:56PM CEST:
>
> A quick question, I would like to be able to change one compilation flag
> for one file.
> I have a few fortran files which don't work (but can be compiled) with
> the optimisation flag (-O).
> Thus, I would lik
Hello,
A quick question, I would like to be able to change one compilation flag
for one file.
I have a few fortran files which don't work (but can be compiled) with
the optimisation flag (-O).
Thus, I would like to disable the -O flag just fort those files. Is it
possible to do that with automake
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 12:01:28PM -0700, Micah J. Cowan wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 06:01:16PM +0100, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the explanation. I'm sorry I have send it to automake
> > but regularly I just don't know what's the correct mailing list.
this is not unus
