Bob Proulx schrieb:
>
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Andreas Büning wrote:
> > > Some weeks ago I sent a mail to the automake-patches mailing list
> > > but it never appeared there. Then I tried the bug-automake
> > > mailing list. I checked the mailing list archives on lists.gnu.org
> > > my post
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Andreas Büning wrote:
> > Some weeks ago I sent a mail to the automake-patches mailing list
> > but it never appeared there. Then I tried the bug-automake
> > mailing list. I checked the mailing list archives on lists.gnu.org
> > my posting never appeared.
>
> That is we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I there a way to tell automake to slighlty alter the process of .c -> .o ?
There are a lot of flags, but i was wondering if there was a way to
replace the rules created by automake with some more user friendly one
(remove echo of command and in
Hi Andreas,
* Andreas Büning wrote on Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:00:10PM CEST:
>
> Some weeks ago I sent a mail to the automake-patches mailing list
> but it never appeared there. Then I tried the bug-automake
> mailing list. I checked the mailing list archives on lists.gnu.org
> my posting never ap
Hi Harald,
* Harald Dunkel wrote on Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 04:01:35PM CEST:
>
> As suggested earlier on this list I am using a wrapper
> around cl.exe to make it look like a Unix compiler.
> Works pretty well, except that the *.Po files are
> empty after the build. Depcomp is called with depmode=no
Hi folks,
As suggested earlier on this list I am using a wrapper
around cl.exe to make it look like a Unix compiler.
Works pretty well, except that the *.Po files are
empty after the build. Depcomp is called with depmode=none
:-(.
Probably Cygwin's makedepend wouldn't work for cl.exe,
but looking
