Re: hello world demo with gtk condition

2006-01-11 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 16:10 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ again, please follow up to automake@gnu.org only ] > > * Matt Hull wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:30:40AM CET: > > icarus.cc.uic.edu/~mhull1/mine-0.0.9.tar.gz > > This makes it much easier to see what is going wrong. > > Try this a

Re: hello world demo with gtk condition

2006-01-11 Thread Matt Hull
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > * Stepan Kasal wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:52:58PM CET: > > this sounds very well: > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:28:40AM -0600, Matt Hull wrote: > > > makefile.am: required file `./compile' not found > > > makefile.am: required file `./depc

Re: hello world demo with gtk condition

2006-01-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stepan Kasal wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 07:52:58PM CET: > this sounds very well: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:28:40AM -0600, Matt Hull wrote: > > makefile.am: required file `./compile' not found > > makefile.am: required file `./depcomp' not found > > Run automake --add-missing to install

Re: hello world demo with gtk condition

2006-01-11 Thread Matt Hull
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Stepan Kasal wrote: > Hello, > > this sounds very well: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:28:40AM -0600, Matt Hull wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/mine-0.0.9 $ aclocal-1.8 -I aclocal && autoheader && > > autoconf && automake-1.8 && ./configure && make > > /usr/share/aclocal/sig

Re: hello world demo with gtk condition

2006-01-11 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, this sounds very well: On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 10:28:40AM -0600, Matt Hull wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/mine-0.0.9 $ aclocal-1.8 -I aclocal && autoheader && > autoconf && automake-1.8 && ./configure && make > /usr/share/aclocal/sigc++.m4:8: warning: underquoted definition of > AM_PATH_SI

Re: EXEEXT and EXTRA_PROGRAMS

2006-01-11 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, > if $whatever; then >want_foo = yes > fi > AM_CONDITIONAL([WANT_FOO], [test "$want_foo" = yes]) ... in this case, it can be shortened to AM_CONDITIONAL([WANT_FOO], [$whatever]) > Makefile.am: > if WANT_FOO > FOO = foo > else > FOO = > endif > bin_PROGRAMS = $(FOO) > EXTRA_PROGRAMS =

RFE: option to avoid autoreconf recursion

2006-01-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, For gnulib-tool, it would be useful if 'autoreconf' had an option --no-recurse or --no-recursion or --no-recursive that would avoid recursive self-invocations of autoreconf. The use case is: gnulib-tool creates many directories with each a Makefile.am and configure.ac and configure file, an

Re: make dvi expected during make distcheck?

2006-01-11 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, > I have make distcheck working with my library, and I love it! Very > cool! > > I notice that after it does a make all, it does a make dvi in every > directory. Is this expected? yes, all Automake generated makefiles implement the target "dvi", even though it does nothing if your packag

Re: EXEEXT and EXTRA_PROGRAMS

2006-01-11 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, > EXTRA_PROGRAMS=foo > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ > correspoding configure.in: > if (certain condidtions) > FOO=foo > AC_SUBST(FOO) > > However, if a platform that application is compiled for uses exe > extensions, FOO still gets value 'foo' - resulting Makefile is incorrect the fix is to u

Re: no TEXI2DVIFLAGS?

2006-01-11 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, I'm afraid this one was left unanswered: On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 09:45:41AM -0700, Ed Hartnett wrote: > # Get texi2dvi to shut the hell up! > TEXI2DVI = texi2dvi -s > > Is there a better way to provide a flag for texi2dvi? It doesn't seem so. Have a nice day, Stepan

Re: hello world demo with gtk condition

2006-01-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ again, please follow up to automake@gnu.org only ] * Matt Hull wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:30:40AM CET: > i am going to take a break from this i think. i have been reading > examples manuals for at least 2 weeks on this. too much time. and i > still can not get it to work. I am sorry.

Re: hello world demo with gtk condition

2006-01-11 Thread Matt Hull
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > [ again, please follow up to automake@gnu.org only ] > > * Matt Hull wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:30:40AM CET: > > i am going to take a break from this i think. i have been reading > > examples manuals for at least 2 weeks on this. too much time.

Re: EXEEXT and EXTRA_PROGRAMS

2006-01-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* D M wrote on Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:28:22PM CET: > > I'm not 100% sure if it is the right group to ask but I'll try. > I'm trying to compile program which is built condinally. So my Makefile.am > looks like this: > EXTRA_PROGRAMS=foo > [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ > correspoding configure.in: > i

EXEEXT and EXTRA_PROGRAMS

2006-01-11 Thread D M
Hello. I'm not 100% sure if it is the right group to ask but I'll try. I'm trying to compile program which is built condinally. So my Makefile.am looks like this: EXTRA_PROGRAMS=foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ correspoding configure.in: if (certain condidtions) FOO=foo AC_SUBST(F