* Paulo Jorge Matos wrote on Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:26:32AM CET:
> On 09/11/05, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I don't understand quite how you do this. If you want to use fewer
> > Makefiles than directories, consider using Automake's subdir-objects
> > option and look at rec
Hi Paulo,
* Paulo Jorge Matos wrote on Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:02:53AM CET:
>
> On a current C++ project I'm using Autoconf and Automake.
> To solve the big subdir tree inside src I used VPATHs in my
> Makefile.am, if there's another way please say so.
I don't understand quite how you do this.
On 09/11/05, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Paulo,
>
Hi,
> * Paulo Jorge Matos wrote on Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 10:02:53AM CET:
> >
> > On a current C++ project I'm using Autoconf and Automake.
> > To solve the big subdir tree inside src I used VPATHs in my
> > Makefile.am, if there
Paulo Jorge Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I..-I./include -ansi -std=c++98
> -pedantic -Wall -DBUILDDATE=`date +'%Y-%b-%d %R'` -g -O2 -MT
^
You need to quote the output of the command substitution since it conta
Hi all,
On a current C++ project I'm using Autoconf and Automake.
To solve the big subdir tree inside src I used VPATHs in my
Makefile.am, if there's another way please say so.
The current problem is due to the fact that using automake with bison
and flex is giving me headaches.
I have msat-parser
