Hi Michael,
* Michael Schulz wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 05:23:30PM CET:
>
> I'm newbe to autoconf, automake.
> I try to make a target in Makefile.am that compiles the base source code
> with some extra code and extra libs.
> But a 'make fb' only compiles the base source code. Makefile.am:
*s
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 08:14:50PM CET:
>
> I am still having a lot of problems getting the auto-tool outfitted
> netcdf to build everywhere. (Specifically AIX f90 - may IBM's
> programmers be cursed with a horrible cube-existence! Oh well, they
> probably already have
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 07:52:01PM CET:
>
> My current problem is that I have some reference netCDF files, which
> ship with the distribution. I also have a test program, which produces
> data files that need to be identical to the reference files shipped
> with the dis
Thanks for all the answers Ralf!
I am still having a lot of problems getting the auto-tool outfitted
netcdf to build everywhere. (Specifically AIX f90 - may IBM's
programmers be cursed with a horrible cube-existence! Oh well, they
probably already have been.)
So I'm taking another sweep through m
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The readonly setting during distcheck is supposed to be a feature:
> When you issue 'make distcheck', first the dist target is updated,
> i.e., a tarball is created, then that is unpacked, then the unpacked
> directory is made readonly, and a VPATH
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 03:39:21PM CET:
>
> I'm trying to get make distcheck working for my package, and I've
> noticed something that's a little inconvenient. When it unpacks my
> package, all the files are read-only, so that when I try and delete
> the directory, I ge
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 03:36:43PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Ed Hartnett wrote on Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:34:27PM CEST:
> >>
> >> I am getting warnings from aclocal about a bunch of macros being
> >> underquoted. But these are not my macro
Hello!
I'm newbe to autoconf, automake.
I try to make a target in Makefile.am that compiles the base source code
with some extra code and extra libs.
But a 'make fb' only compiles the base source code. Makefile.am:
bin_PROGRAMS = moll
#
# m-files #
###
Howdy all!
I'm trying to get make distcheck working for my package, and I've
noticed something that's a little inconvenient. When it unpacks my
package, all the files are read-only, so that when I try and delete
the directory, I get a bunch of permission denied errors.
Is this expected behavior f
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Ed,
>
> * Ed Hartnett wrote on Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 04:34:27PM CEST:
>>
>> I am getting warnings from aclocal about a bunch of macros being
>> underquoted. But these are not my macros! They seem to be part of
>> aclocal.
>
>> /usr/share/aclocal/g-w
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 02:18:40AM CET:
>
> What am I missing here? I define the following in my Makefile.am:
>
> # Point the fortran compiler to current directory.
> AM_FFLAGS = -I$(srcdir)
>
> But no matter what I do, that -I. never appears when the compile
> happen
Ed Hartnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What am I missing here? I define the following in my Makefile.am:
>
> # Point the fortran compiler to current directory.
> AM_FFLAGS = -I$(srcdir)
>
> But no matter what I do, that -I. never appears when the compile
> happens:
>
> f95 -g -O2 -ff2c -c type
Hi Ed,
* Ed Hartnett wrote on Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:15:29PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > * Ed Hartnett wrote on Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:57:44PM CET:
> >>
> >> I find myself setting AM_CFLAGS=-g in many subdirectories.
> >
> > Why not just put
> >
> > AC_SUBST([AM_CFL
13 matches
Mail list logo
