On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, tom fogal wrote:
Your arguments are convincing, I will switch my setup away from
convenience archives.
As you proceed with your non-recursive build, be sure to keep in mind
that you are leaving the common path so you can expect to encounter
more bugs or things that need
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Tom Tromey wrote:
"tom" == tom fogal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tom> Basically I'd like each module to build their own libtool convenience
tom> library, and then have /src/Makefile.am link all of those modules'
tom> convenience libraries into one that is the union of all
*mutter*, forgot to cc the list again...
--- Forwarded Message
From: tom fogal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bob Friesenhahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: non-recursive automake advice?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:29:09 CDT."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <
> "tom" == tom fogal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
tom> Basically I'd like each module to build their own libtool convenience
tom> library, and then have /src/Makefile.am link all of those modules'
tom> convenience libraries into one that is the union of all of them.
Do you really want each sep
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, tom fogal wrote:
So I've been convinced that the effort involved in changing a build
system to not use recursive make is worth it, and I was wondering if
A noble objective.
Unfortunately in the 'Inc.am' files I need to remember to qualify every
filename with not just '$(
So I've been convinced that the effort involved in changing a build
system to not use recursive make is worth it, and I was wondering if
anyone had some good advice as to how I should go about doing this,
since my way seems to be having issues =).
I have a directory setup like the following:
/
/s
