On Sunday 10 July 2005 12:40 pm, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand. The file doesn't have to exist, it only has
> > to be listed as a distributed file in Makefile.am.
> > It should be enough to get the rule in Makefile.in.
>
> Wrong. Sorry :-(
P.S. don't sweat it. It was a good
Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:46:48AM CEST:
> >>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ralf> * Jeremy C. Reed wrote on Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:58:43PM CEST:
> >>
> >> nobase_include_HEADERS = histedit.h editline/readline.h
> >> Shoul
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> It's a bit tricky to reproduce: You
> need a system which has no argz.h, then configure, then `make check'
> without prior make. If you had ever run `make' before in this build
> tree, even after `make clean' the dependency information is stored in
> libltdl/.deps/*.Plo, a
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:40:19PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> On Sunday 10 July 2005 10:32 am, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > [...] The file doesn't have to exist, it only has
> > to be listed as a distributed file in Makefile.am.
> > It should be enough to get the rule in Makefile.in.
>
> Wrong.