Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] sharutils' autoconfigury]

2005-07-11 Thread Bruce Korb
On Sunday 10 July 2005 12:40 pm, Bruce Korb wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand. The file doesn't have to exist, it only has > > to be listed as a distributed file in Makefile.am. > > It should be enough to get the rule in Makefile.in. > > Wrong. Sorry :-( P.S. don't sweat it. It was a good

Re: Is nobase_include_HEADERS supposed to precreate directories?

2005-07-11 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hi Alexandre, * Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:46:48AM CEST: > >>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ralf> * Jeremy C. Reed wrote on Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:58:43PM CEST: > >> > >> nobase_include_HEADERS = histedit.h editline/readline.h > >> Shoul

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: libtool 2.1a failed mdemo-make.test on Solaris

2005-07-11 Thread Bruno Haible
Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > It's a bit tricky to reproduce: You > need a system which has no argz.h, then configure, then `make check' > without prior make. If you had ever run `make' before in this build > tree, even after `make clean' the dependency information is stored in > libltdl/.deps/*.Plo, a

Re: [Fwd: [PATCH] sharutils' autoconfigury]

2005-07-11 Thread Stepan Kasal
Hello, On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:40:19PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote: > On Sunday 10 July 2005 10:32 am, Stepan Kasal wrote: > > [...] The file doesn't have to exist, it only has > > to be listed as a distributed file in Makefile.am. > > It should be enough to get the rule in Makefile.in. > > Wrong.