I'm pleased to announce the release of Automake 1.9.6.
This is a bug-fix release, the list of bugs fixed is appended.
You can find the new release here:
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.9.6.tar.gz
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/automake/automake-1.9.6.tar.gz.sig
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu
On Sunday 10 July 2005 10:32 am, you wrote:
> Hello,
Hi again :)
> I'm not sure I understand. The file doesn't have to exist, it only has
> to be listed as a distributed file in Makefile.am.
> It should be enough to get the rule in Makefile.in.
Wrong. Sorry :-(
> + automake --gnu --add-missin
>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
pds> I don't know whether automake currently works correctly
pds> for Java with any other version of make, but this would
pds> definitely cause that not to be the case going forward.
adl> I believe $-filenames works only wit
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 12:19:03PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> The other alternative is to do away with backward compatibility and just
> say that as of release automake XXX you need GNU make 3.81 if your
> makefiles have $ in the names.
that sounds reasonable. Perhaps there should be an A
Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 08:15:08PM CEST:
>> * Ed Hartnett wrote on Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 07:28:38PM CEST:
> >
>> > I have a slew of test programs, and my Makefile.am contains something
>> > like this:
>> >
>> > # These programs
> However, apparently there is no choice but to support them since Java
> requires it. It really confuses me how a company like Sun could create
> a language that is so difficult to use with standard UNIX tools. If
> you're going to invent a language, why not make it easy to work with?
I may be
%% Alexandre Duret-Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
adl> So any solution that require a syntax that is different in
adl> prerequisites than it is in the commands seems wrong to me.
pds> I definitely agree that this incongruity is disturbing, but
pds> that's the way it is.
adl> Don't re
>>> "pds" == Paul D Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
adl> So any solution that require a syntax that is different in
adl> prerequisites than it is in the commands seems wrong to me.
pds> I definitely agree that this incongruity is disturbing, but that's the
pds> way it is.
Don't read
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ralf> Hi Jeremy,
Ralf> * Jeremy C. Reed wrote on Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:58:43PM CEST:
>>
>> nobase_include_HEADERS = histedit.h editline/readline.h
[...]
>> Should it also precreate the "editline" subdirectory also?
Ralf> If the
