Hi!
[BTW, this would be more appropriate for the autoconf list.]
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:59:56PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> @sed \
> -e 's,@@perlmoduledir@@,$(libexecdir)/perl,' \
...
>bindir = ${exec_prefix}/bin
>libexecdir = ${exec_prefix}/lib/${PACKAGE}
>
> Ca
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:49:40PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> [...] I was really leery of changing the layout of the variables
> defined by the user. Normally Automake tries to output definitions
> as it reads them.
I like your attitude.
> Maybe Automake could do that if the varia
>>> "J" == J T Conklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
J> Albert Chin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So, should automake change lines like:
>> foo_SOURCES = [long list of sources]
>> to the following in Makefile.in:
>> foo_SOURCES = $(foo_SOURCES_1) $(foo_SOURCES_2) ...
>> foo_SOURCES_1 = [list
>>> "Tom" == Tom Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Tom> Dang. The AC_CONFIG_FILES technique is much nicer (less
Tom> files to change). Are there some bad side effects of
Tom> using
Tom> touch fragment.mk && autoreconf
Tom> that I'm not aware of?
It's bad to overwrite a file that
Sorry, it's been a while since I looked at how this project is being
packaged. ;)
I have a few Makefile.am that include sections like this:
DirTree.pl: DirTree.pl.in
@rm -f spider.pl
@sed \
-e 's,@@perlmoduledir@@,$(libexecdir)/perl,' \
-e 's,@@swis
I've got a project that includes docs in perldoc format. Those .pod
files are in cvs with the project.
We also generate an html version of the docs, but those html files are
not part of the project in cvs. There's external tools to generate
the html docs.
The idea is before we roll a tarball w
>>> "Stepan" == Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Stepan> 1) I noticed typos; see the patch attached.
Stepan> 2) Regarding the sentence:
[...]
Thanks. I installed the following on HEAD, and the Options
chunk on branch-1-9.
2005-02-08 Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* d
>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Pélissier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> It is not enough for my NEWS file. I have a copyright
Patrick> license (GNU LGPL) before:
For ChangeLog, NEWS, and other files where text is added at the
top, the GNU Coding Standards say to put the license notice at
the en
It is said at
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Options.html#Options:
check-news
Cause make dist to fail unless the current version number appears in the
first few lines of the NEWS file.
The problem is that it checks only in the first 15 lines:
distdir: $(DISTFILES)
