On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 13:01 -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> So adding $(SHELL) might not be wrong.
>
> But SHELL might disagree with CONFIG_SHELL; the latter is used to run
> config.status. So adding $(SHELL) might be wrong.
Possi
>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> So these days, I suspect that SHELL != CONFIG_SHELL mismatch is the
Paul> greatest problem here.
Actually it's rather the converse :) The two variables are equal
(configure does SHELL=${CONFIG_SHELL-/bin/sh}), and this has
caused some
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> So adding $(SHELL) might not be wrong.
But SHELL might disagree with CONFIG_SHELL; the latter is used to run
config.status. So adding $(SHELL) might be wrong.
Noah Misch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I suspect more systems sti
* Noah Misch wrote on Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 03:32:01PM CET:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 05:10 -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > If you believe `man perlrun', some systems do not respect #! and start all
> > > scripts under csh.
http://www
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 02:49:29PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 05:10 -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> > If you believe `man perlrun', some systems do not respect #! and start all
> > scripts under csh.
>
> I assume, the systems they refer to, actually are victim to the length
>
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 05:10 -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:53:51AM +0100, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> > - cd $(top_builddir) && ./config.status $(subdir)/$@
> > + cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $(subdir)/$@
>
> > The question: Why does Automake add "$(S
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:53:51AM +0100, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> - cd $(top_builddir) && ./config.status $(subdir)/$@
> + cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $(subdir)/$@
> The question: Why does Automake add "$(SHELL)" to the command?
If you believe `man perlrun', some syst
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:35:58PM +0300, Konstantin Osipov wrote:
> .sh:
> @SED@ \
> -e 's!@''bindir''@!$(bindir)!g' \
> -e 's!@''pkglibdir''@!$(pkglibdir)!g' \
[...]
> .sh:
> $SHELL $(top_builddir)/config.status [EMAIL PROTECTED]:$@
> So I had to look at all .sh templates
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 10:47:13AM +1100, Tom Howard wrote:
> Slight problem; Removed all the generated files, did an autoreconf and
> automake complains that fragement.mk is not found. I can just touch the
> file before running autoreconf, but is there a nice way to tell automake
> that it c
