On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:47 pm, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Bruce> Um, okay, but if automake is going to emit the message, then it only
> Bruce> makes sense (to me) that automake include the documentation.
>
> That would make sense to me too. However automake is not
> emitting the mess
>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bruce> On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:37 am, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:28:36AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
>> > > $ autoreconf
>> > > autoreconf: configure.ac: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is used, but not
>> > > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSIO
Hi,
contents of Makefile.am
INCLUDES = \
$(WEWA_CFLAGS) \
$(MOZILLA_COMPONENT_CFLAGS)
bin_PROGRAMS = \
wewa
wewa_SOURCES = \
main.c \
wewatypes.h
wewa_LDADD =\
$(WEWA_LIBS) \
$(MOZILLA_COMPONENT_LIBS)
configure.in contents:
AC_INIT([
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 01:37 am, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:28:36AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > > $ autoreconf
> > > autoreconf: configure.ac: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is used, but not
> > > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION
>
> > 1. The automake example of AM_GNU_GETTEXT does not show
> >
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:28:36AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > $ autoreconf
> > autoreconf: configure.ac: AM_GNU_GETTEXT is used, but not
> > AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION
> 1. The automake example of AM_GNU_GETTEXT does not show
> AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION being used in conjunction with it.
> I
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 17:12 +0100, Antonio Coralles wrote:
> May there be a differnece between ranlib and i686-pc-linux-gnu-ranlib
> and/or ar and i686-pc-linux-gnu-ar ?
It depends on what you are doing. You are providing to little details.
In general, is supposed to be a native tool, while
-
