Stepan Kasal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> All that cruft could be removed if automake interpreted "+=" of a
>> previously unseen variable as an assignment.
>
> ``a lot of code''?
>
> All you need is:
> 1) remember the list of all variables used
>(To be exact, you don't need the list of variab
Hi,
Could you please tell me whether automake 1.7.6 and automake 1.6.3
works on
Solaris 9, Solaris 10, HPUX-11i, Aix 5.2?
If yes,please send me the Url where I can find the compatiable automake
downloads.
Thanks,
Lavanya
On Tue, 2005-01-11 at 11:09 +0100, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:35:27AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > > if [some-shell-script-test]
> > > then
> > > ...
> > > AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [true])
> > > else
> > > ...
> > > AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [false])
> > > fi
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 01:08:22PM -0500, Simon Perreault wrote:
> SUBDIRS = ...
> DIST_SUBDIRS = $(SUBDIRS) examples
>
> .PHONY: examples clean-examples
>
> examples: all
> ( cd $(top_builddir)/examples && $(MAKE) $(MFLAGS) )
>
> clean-examples:
> ( cd $(top_builddir)/examples && $
Hi Bruce,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:35:27AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > if [some-shell-script-test]
> > then
> > ...
> > AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [true])
> > else
> > ...
> > AM_CONDITIONAL([XXX], [false])
> > fi
> reading the docs some more, they explicitly state to not do this.
I re-rea
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:03:21PM -0800, J.T. Conklin wrote:
> [...] MPC's automake module has a lot of otherwise unecessary code
> to track whether a given automake principal has been output in order
> to use "=" or "+=".
>
> All that cruft could be removed if automake interpreted "+=" of
